If our military doesn’t have contingency plans for this potential event, then they are negligent.
Especially after Nidal Hasan, when it was seen in technicolor that the enemy intends to infiltrate the highest places they can.
Do you think any of our military people have watched “Valkyrie” and asked themselves what they would do in that situation? Do you think they have ever talked about what might have been?
I would like to believe our military men and women are high enough caliber people that at least some of them do think about serious hypothetical scenarios such as this - and that the military ENCOURAGES them to think through all the dilemmas that they might confront. At least as hypotheticals, but I think there are lots in the military who recognize that with every move Obama makes to help our enemies and piss on America, it becomes less hypothetical all the time.
And I can tell you for a fact that Lt Col Terry Lakin and a bunch of other military people have pondered these questions very, very seriously. I know because I’ve heard them.
Regarding contingency plans and whether the military addresses various scenarios, including if the POTUS is an enemy combatant..... this is taken from http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/bellringers_corner/hello_central/news.php?q=1256853577
(If there are retired or active duty military officers who are reading this and can either affirm or deny the likelihood of this scenario being addressed within military classes, as well as whether this prescribed response fits what they were taught..... please let me know, either here or in Freepmail. Thanks! =)
It is introduced this way:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
“Dear Patrick,
I did some inquiry with some fellow retired and active duty military officers that are in the know, concerning the question of “who has the authority to arrest the President?” Some serve in the Pentagon. This is the best response I received from an awesome fellow Patriot. I will withhold his name to protect him from retaliation. However, he is not afraid. This matches what I was taught in the Intelligence schools and military schools at Air University and other Universities that I have attended. I served my Country and the US Constitution for 32 years as an Air Force Officer. I still work as a consultant on matters of national security...”
>>>>>>>>>>
And this is the response that he got from a retired or active duty military officer:
>>>>>>>>>>
“Question: Does the Provost Marshal General of the Army or Marine Corp have the athority to arrest the President?
This would not ‘usually’ be the case. The Provost Marshal General of The Army is a Headquarters US Army flag officer position and serves directly under the Chief of Staff - US Army.
In one of our legal classes in Command & Staff School - Air University, the scenario was built classroom-style that greatly parallels the terrible situation we find ourselves in today. (Please remember that these classes were taught by Harvard Law School folks with a string of letters behind their names as long as your arm.)
“It has been determined that the president has committed treason in a manner unmistakable to all. The Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff convenes a covert meeting to get a vote of the JCS. (Here is where the Provost Marshall General of the Army and/or Marines may be in attendance.)
Please remember at this time that a military officer takes an oath of office to do one thing and one thing only - “....... to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against ALL enemies, foreign OR DOMESTIC.” They must determine above a reasonable doubt that the enemy domestic is the treasonous president.
A convoy of 10 to 12 HIGH ranking officers depart the Pentagon, accompanied by a large contingent of Military Police (Provost Marshal General??) and all necessary armament and provisions to enter the grounds of the White House, by FORCE if necessary, proceed to the location of the president and put him under arrest.
(This scenario is when we are not at DECLARED WAR)
Then, The Chairman of the JCS would advise the Speaker of The House, The President of the Senate, The Attorney General and the Secretary of State of their actions.
In times of DECLARED WAR, the president can be shot on the spot if he resists or is a threat to the nation or those around him. Please remember, that the last DECLARED WAR was the second world war, declared on 8 December 1941.
Why haven’t we seen this today. Simple - we are devoid of Constitutional military leadership - they have morphed into political, pussified, wishy-washy, pants-wetting yes-men. (Enough to make you puke)
Hope this helps.”
>>>>>>>>>>>>