Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SoothingDave; xsmommy

I’ve read a couple of articles this AM that say the mandate will collapse over the SCOTUS decision-I can’t really see that from the explanations-am I missing something?


80 posted on 07/01/2014 12:28:46 PM PDT by Texan5 ("You've got to saddle up your boys, you've got to draw a hard line"...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: Texan5

http://www.nationalreview.com/corner/381668/conestoga-and-hobby-lobby-aftermath-begins-matt-bowman

I was just reading this.

************************

In not only Hobby Lobby, but in Newland from the Tenth Circuit (the first injunction ever granted against the mandate), and Grote and Korte from the Seventh Circuit, the Courts of Appeals affirmatively concluded that the mandate is not supported by a compelling interest. This morning’s orders denying review in those cases leave in place this circuit precedent.

***************************
Thus the Supreme Court’s decision not to rule on the mandate’s compelling interest is not a sign that it meets that test. It is a recognition that the Courts of Appeals have reached a consensus finding no compelling interest, and thus the Supreme Court has no need to decide that issue.


81 posted on 07/01/2014 1:00:40 PM PDT by SoothingDave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson