Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Sherman Logan
But it leaves him $200k to live on, which can be done quite well. The guy is overtaxed, not enslaved.

Sure, he can live on it. But since he can no longer afford the luxuries with which he's rewarded himself for his hard work, why bother working so hard? Down goes productivity, since it is punished anyway.

42 posted on 07/10/2014 7:08:43 AM PDT by JimRed (Excise the cancer before it kills us; feed & water the Tree of Liberty! TERM LIMITS NOW & FOREVER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: JimRed

Of course. More likely, actually, is that tax avoidance measure will be taken.

My understanding is that in Europe top executives have MUCH more extensive expense accounts: clothing allowance, housing allowance, entertainment allowance, etc.

Compensation just moves from taxable into non-taxable categories.

Many if not most top earners today are not tied to a specific locality. If they consider themselves overtaxed, they’ll just move somewhere else. And the government involved loses all of their tax.


46 posted on 07/10/2014 8:20:24 AM PDT by Sherman Logan (Perception wins all the battles. Reality wins all the wars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson