Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009

You might be right. Part of the reason I threw my support behind Newt - which I later apologized for - was because he was such a good debater. Really, what we needed was someone with good credentials (Rick Perry), good ideas (Herman Cain), or at least good debate skills (Newt).

What the Republicans got was a candidate with socialist credentials (Massachusetts gov), no good ideas (Romneycare), and no debate skills. Well, Willard got under Bathhouse Barry’s skin in the first debate, but he absolutely tanked from that point on.


22 posted on 07/23/2014 7:18:47 AM PDT by Cato in PA (Resist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: Cato in PA
.. but he absolutely tanked from that point on.

There was a history behind THAT:

And a BIG behind it was!

27 posted on 07/23/2014 5:52:48 PM PDT by Alas Babylon!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson