It's easy to post a mountain of crap and then allege that it supports you and that it's non-biased. The other side has to weigh through all that crap and look up sources to refute it.
It simply isn't worth the time or trouble because it won't make the slightest dent on your opinion if your studies are challenged or disproved or shown to be biased or from biased sources.
Again, this isn't about Cancer, this is about using "Cancer" (really Pot) research as a tool to push for smoking.
If any of that crap is true, time will bear it out. I have time. I'll wait.