Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
I very much doubt you've read any of those studies, and if you think i'm going to wade through them you are nuts.

They are the citations given by the National Cancer Institute (at http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/cam/cannabis/healthprofessional/page4#Section_26) for the antitumor effects of marijuana's active components. Will you be claiming that the National Cancer Institute is all about legalizing pot?

Again, this isn't about Cancer, this is about using "Cancer" (really Pot) research as a tool to push for smoking.

And you know this although you haven't and won't look at any of the studies. Very impressive.

It simply isn't worth the time or trouble because it won't make the slightest dent on your opinion if your studies are challenged or disproved or shown to be biased or from biased sources.

It's my opinion you're focused on? You think too small - any FReeper in search of insight can read this thread. I'm making available facts, while you're making available your self-contained reality where all evidence presented for the medical benefits of marijuana is deemed unreliable because it's been presented as evidence the medical benefits of marijuana.

55 posted on 07/24/2014 6:17:47 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom

I’m not interested in discussing the push for pot legalization today. Sorry.


59 posted on 07/24/2014 8:06:49 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson