Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp

>> How about “POT researchers try to prove POT is Beneficial.”

POT opponent tries to prove POT not beneficial.

Your arguments are stylistically no different than what you’re opposing.


68 posted on 07/24/2014 6:37:04 PM PDT by Gene Eric (Don't be a statist!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: Gene Eric
I do not bother with well thought out arguments on this topic anymore. I've done that in the past, and they work about as well as irrational and nonsensical arguments.

Everything is just off the cuff because it is a waste of time to do otherwise.

74 posted on 07/25/2014 7:46:59 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp (Partus Sequitur Patrem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson