I counted nine alleged "frauds".
Of those nine, the four are ancient history, scientific mistakes corrected by science itself, just as it should be.
The other five represent serious "frauds" only in the sense that this particular report on them is major fraudulent, from the minor details to what it implies.
For one example, it suggests something "fraudulent" in the science on Neanderthals, because one scientist was alleged to have fudged some of his age-dates.
But the science on evolution of pre-humans does not depend on one scientist or one fossil.
In fact, there are hundreds of pre-human & early human sites, yielding bones or fossils representing thousands of individuals in dozens of species or sub-species living over the past seven million years.
Here is a partial listing of some of those.
And here, yet again, is a display of those allegedly non-existent "transitional forms".
Well here my mileage has varied significantly from yours.
“In fact, there are hundreds of pre-human & early human sites, yielding bones or fossils representing thousands of individuals in dozens of species or sub-species living over the past seven million years.”
Sorry, but you’ll need to prove this statement as it contradicts everything I’ve read and researched for same.
In fact, the number of sites and artifacts found with ancient human remains is quite small.