Using the opinion of the latter-day US Supreme Court does not bolster your opinion - rather it detracts from anything even remotely defensible. Are these the same folks who approved of Obamacare?
My point is: you and ShadowAce have here asserted your authority to declare so-called "historical sciences" as "not science".
You have also asserted that your creationist beliefs are somehow a part of science.
Such claims have been reviewed and declared illegitimate by the US Supreme and other courts.
So you are not only arguing against me, you argue against the law of the land, applied to public schools.
Of course, you may claim the Supreme Court is wrong here, as in other cases, but I'm telling you they're not wrong in this case, BECAUSE in every sense you can think of, there is a serious difference between what we call "natural science" and traditional ideas about religion, including God's actions in creating the Universe.
So, you don't want to yoke your religion and science together -- they will not "play well together", especially in our increasingly "multi-cultural" polity.
Much better to keep them separate, and teach God's miracles of creation in church or other classes devoted to such matters.