Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

Using the opinion of the latter-day US Supreme Court does not bolster your opinion - rather it detracts from anything even remotely defensible. Are these the same folks who approved of Obamacare?


112 posted on 09/17/2014 11:43:59 AM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies ]


To: BrandtMichaels; ShadowAce
BrandtMichaels: "Using the opinion of the latter-day US Supreme Court does not bolster your opinion - rather it detracts from anything even remotely defensible."

My point is: you and ShadowAce have here asserted your authority to declare so-called "historical sciences" as "not science".
You have also asserted that your creationist beliefs are somehow a part of science.

Such claims have been reviewed and declared illegitimate by the US Supreme and other courts.
So you are not only arguing against me, you argue against the law of the land, applied to public schools.

Of course, you may claim the Supreme Court is wrong here, as in other cases, but I'm telling you they're not wrong in this case, BECAUSE in every sense you can think of, there is a serious difference between what we call "natural science" and traditional ideas about religion, including God's actions in creating the Universe.

So, you don't want to yoke your religion and science together -- they will not "play well together", especially in our increasingly "multi-cultural" polity.
Much better to keep them separate, and teach God's miracles of creation in church or other classes devoted to such matters.

119 posted on 09/17/2014 12:23:24 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson