Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BroJoeK

You’re provided links claim pre-humans - that was not my request - fail.


118 posted on 09/17/2014 12:13:54 PM PDT by BrandtMichaels
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies ]


To: BrandtMichaels
BrandtMichaels: "You’re provided links claim pre-humans - that was not my request - fail."

No, pal, YOU fail, because presented with facts, all you can think to do is bob, weave and quibble over words.
You asked for "ancient human remains" and the sites I linked gave both "ancient human" and "pre-human" remains from the past seven million years -- hundreds of sites, thousands of individuals, dozens of species or sub-species.

Scientists have their own ways to classify separate "species", "sub-species" or "breeds", and they do not really specify exactly where "pre-human" ends and "fully modern human" begins, so you can make your own distinctions.
For example, do you consider Neanderthals as homo sapiens, or some separate species?

In my opinion "fully modern human" begins with Adam, with farming and the first cities, but that's my religious opinion, not a biological differentiation.

120 posted on 09/17/2014 12:39:45 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson