Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hardest thing to explain is the evidence everybody has decided not to see…
9/2/14 | Joe Lynch

Posted on 09/04/2014 9:16:38 AM PDT by westcoastwillieg

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last
To: cousteausghost; butterdezillion

Here’s a conspiracy for you. You claim a Freeper—your next door neighbor—invited you to join FR in order to share your expertise in diving. Since then you’ve posted a series of nasty wisecracks to Butter—things that not even long-term freepers would dream of saying.

So here’s the question. What does your next door neighbor think of your nastiness toward a long-time, and at least formerly monthly site-supporter [I don’t know about the current status, but that was the case for years]? Was this really the idea when you were ‘invited’?

I.e.: ‘Hey, neighbor, how about you join this discussion forum I belong to, so as to share your extensive diving knowledge on a particular thread that touches on the subject. Oh, and while you’re at it, why not make yourself look like a jerk by—as a total newbie—singling out a long-time member/monthly site-supporter, and accusing her of posting while drinking, etc.’


41 posted on 09/06/2014 7:31:02 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

In The Villages everyone is nasty - haven’t you heard?


42 posted on 09/08/2014 7:52:49 AM PDT by cousteausghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

When I find someone who has bizarre theories, I follow them so they don’t mislead others into embarrassing themselves. The Fuddy theory was one of the most ridiculous things I’ve ever read, and tbh I’m fascinated that any brain could invent such a series of improbable events. I’m sure if Jim thinks I’m a jerk he will warn or ban me - until then, have a nice day. Fish are jumpin’ here - I’m off.


43 posted on 09/08/2014 7:56:29 AM PDT by cousteausghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: cousteausghost

I have heard nothing more bizarre than your story about how/why you joined FR. I haven’t heard anything more ridiculous, either. I’m fascinated any brain could have not only invented it, but evidently imagined someone else might perchance believe it...though in all honestly I don’t think anyone did.

I didn’t call you a jerk, btw. Go back & reread what I posted. You will find that it wasn’t name-calling at all.


44 posted on 09/08/2014 1:04:45 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

“Look like a jerk” - semantics!


45 posted on 09/10/2014 4:23:14 AM PDT by cousteausghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: cousteausghost

Context is lost on anti-birthes...as is so much else. It comes from leaving the realm of logic and rationality behind, which is the prerequisite for believing that Obama is even semi-honest/trustworthy.

Unfortunately for anti-birthers, living in the land of illogic comes at a cost, not the least of which is intelligence. Before long the anti-birther has reduced him or herself to a near-moronic intellectual level. Yet it is essential to the anti-birther’s psyche to believe that he/she is far more intelligent than the average birther. Hence the group need to play idiotic games aimed at ‘proving’ anti-birthers are of superior intelligence. Obama does the exact same thing. These games are not very sophisticated, btw. Truly intelligent people wouldn’t stoop to them, but for the anti-birther’s psychological well-being they are essential.

It’s nearly impossible to tell which is more pathetic, the pathological liar’s self-delusions, or those of his benighted supporters. Both are sad spectacles. I suppose the supporters are most to be pitied. At least Obama gets AF1 and lots of golf time. His supporters only get to look used, taken advantage of, and clueless.


46 posted on 09/10/2014 3:04:29 PM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Fantasywriter

I wonder if my having a freeper neighbour is any mmore unlikely than the Fuddy story (secret divers, two planes, wax bodies, fake funerals, fake caskets, thousands in on it) that led me here. I’ll let anyone with a brain cell decide that.

Reading your comment you’d almost think birthers had made some progress in the last 6 years. How many cases is it birthers have lost now? Is it over 400 yet? And how many public figures are on board - Trump and Pat Boone I hear you say? Of course Sheriff Joe will ride to the rescue, because Mike Zullo is so close to cracking this thing wide open, the crack detective and his team of ... oh no, it’s just him now isn’t it? And he wasn’t a detective ever was he - just a small town police officer for a few years decades ago. Actually he’s been a used car salesman for most of the last 20 years hasn’t he?

Sure - I’m the one that’s deluded! Have a great week.


47 posted on 09/10/2014 9:57:26 PM PDT by cousteausghost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: cousteausghost

So you think the claim of living next door to “a freeper” is the most unlikely part of your story? Figures. Shilling for Obama has cost anti-birthers their most basic ability to think, reason & analyze, & none of them even realize it, much less resent him for it.

Let me break it down for you. So you claim to live next door to a freeper. Long odds, given FR membership vs overall population, but let that go. Long odds happen.

But you don’t live next door to merely ‘a freeper’. No, you live next door to a freeper who was deeply following the Fuddy thread. So deeply engaged in it, in fact, that he she would take the unusual move, being a conservative-birther, of enlisting the aid of a liberal to set his fellow freepers right on the oh-so-critical-issue of scuba diving.

[& how, you may ask, do I know your [imaginary] FR ‘neighbor’ is a conservative birther? Why, you told me so. You told us all that, in your Tall Tale intro. Very convenient of you to do so, I might add.]

Well that narrows it down—and extends the odds exponentially. How many freepers were that engrossed in the Fuddy thread? How many die-hard conservative birthers would enlist the aid of a liberal neighbor, going so far as to invite him, contrary to the rules of the site [it’s a meeting place for conservatives, not liberals] to sign up & put his fellow conservatives some knowledge?

I’m guess the answer to that one is ‘zero’. I have never yet, even once, met a fellow conservative birther who expressed anything close to the sentiment that what we really need on our birther threads is yet another Obama-shilling liberal. Rather, ten out of ten believe there are too many Obama-apologists infesting the site already.

But wait, there’s more. Not only are you a diving expert—you’re a world class anti-birther!! [Don’t get excited. It doesn’t take much to be World Class in this category. Just memorize the same lame talking points that anti-birthers post over and over and over and over and over and over and over throughout their boring, repetitious no-life lives, and you quality.] You have every single anti-birther TP at your fingertips—PLUS, as an extra added bonus, you know all the anti-birther scuttlebutt too. You really are a premier anti-birther!!

So now, what are the odds that a conservative birther just happens, coincidentally, to ask his liberal neighbor to join a conservative site, claiming it’s all about scuba diving know-how, to comment on an esoteric birther thread, and the diving expert ‘just happens’ to be the mother of all anti-birthers?

Hint, Big Blue couldn’t calculate those odds. They’re off the chart.

Oh, & please don’t ask me how I know you’re a liberal. You told me that personally, & I can’t/won’t believe you didn’t do it on purpose. Nobody, not even an anti-birther, can be so clueless as to say what you said & not know it gives the game away.

Now comes your ‘brilliant’ argument about birthers & the courts. So original. So dispositive. What’s left so say?

How about this. The courts have overwhelmingly found that the Constitution is more concerned with changing the definition of ‘marriage’ so as to establish and protect the right of two homosexuals to legally marry in a manner identical to that of a man & a woman than it is with respecting State’s Rights. Do you agree that the vast majority of decisions on this subject are correct? If so, why?


48 posted on 09/11/2014 8:32:14 AM PDT by Fantasywriter (Any attempt to do forensic work using Internet artifacts is fraught with pitfalls. JoeProbono)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

Google “radar cross section “.

A small plane has one “cross section” (is ‘smaller’)

A B-52 has a different “cross section” (is ‘larger’) **

** unless it has been modified a’ la “”flight of the Old Dog” ;)


49 posted on 09/11/2014 7:10:19 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Nero Germanicus

Nero,

For once I agree with you.

That “tip of the spear” is a formidable deterrent indeed!!!!!!!

G-d help any nation (or rogue group) crossing that front line defense!!!!!


50 posted on 09/11/2014 7:16:09 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: DoodleDawg

Steven Segal with Sheriff Joe Arpiao MCSO posse

51 posted on 09/11/2014 7:17:04 PM PDT by Brother Cracker (You are more likely to find krugerrands in a Cracker Jack box then 22 ammo at Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion

What would stop it?

NORAD

Cheyenne Mountain

Other “watchmen on the wall” of which (for good reason) we know nothing.


WildHighlander57


52 posted on 09/11/2014 7:18:42 PM PDT by WildHighlander57 ((WildHighlander57, returning after lurking since 2000)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: WildHighlander57

There’s no one in Cheyenne Mountain anymore. It’s all been moved to Shreiver AFB and Fort Carson.


53 posted on 09/11/2014 7:30:15 PM PDT by Benito Cereno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

His “father” was Kenyan according to the Big O, making him a British citizen at birth


54 posted on 09/19/2014 10:48:03 AM PDT by RichardMoore (There is only one issue- Life: dump TV and follow a plant based diet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: RichardMoore

I want to see his college records more than his BC, they either say he is a Kenyan Citizen or a Indonesian Citizen...

Either way it is bad for him....

EVEN IF Obama is an “American citizen from birth”, if his college transcripts say “Indonesian” or “Kenyan” (because he wanted foreign student aid) It is still FRAUD he commited against the US government when he WAS AN ADULT!

The college records could potentially be more devastating that even the BC....

I think that is why they released the farce that is “Adobe Photoshopped BC”. they wanted a red herring to take attention off his college records...


55 posted on 09/19/2014 11:02:12 AM PDT by GraceG (No, My Initials are not A.B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: GraceG
It's there for anyone who wants to take the time to find it.

One other thing.
Obama is NOT black !
The ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF is ARAB-KENYAN. The Arab-Kenyan Barack Hussein Obama II, (a.k.a. Barry Soetoro), ( the one guilty of TREASON ! ) has NO legitimate Social Security Number.
His father was NOT an immigrant to the United States.
Barack Obama Sr. was a "Transient Alien" because he did NOT intend on residing in the United States permanently.
Barack Obama Sr. was a dual citizen of Great Britain and Kenya, and NEVER a United States Citizen.His mother could NOT impart U.S. citizen to her son, Barack Obama II, because she did NOT meet the legal requirements to do so, at the time her son was born IN the Coast Provincial General Hospital, MOMBASA, KENYA at 7:21 pm on August 4, 1961.
Democrats knew this and tried to eliminate the "Natural Born Citizen" requirement at least 8 times BEFORE Obama won his election in 2008.

Obama is NOT a United States Citizen, and is NOT a LEGAL IMMIGRANT.
He has no VISA allowing him into this country.
Barack Hussein Obama II IS ILLEGAL !
He should be IMPEACHED IMMEDIATELY, tried for TREASON, SENTENCED to death, and then have his body deported back to Kenya.
56 posted on 09/19/2014 11:09:06 AM PDT by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: GraceG

You’re probably right. It’s all about deflection. This presidency is a constitutional crisis


57 posted on 09/20/2014 8:34:27 AM PDT by RichardMoore (There is only one issue- Life: dump TV and follow a plant based diet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-57 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson