Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FredZarguna

Yep. It’s a great day for the truth. Bad day to be a 10-11-11 board of trustee member.

The media’s day is coming. As I said in my post, this isn’t a case that Sue would settle for even 9 figures. It’s going to discovery and these people WILL be deposed.

Sadly because of the state’s dragging their feet on Curley/Schultz/Spanier (btw, just toss in the towel PA), there won’t be any discovery made public. Can only hope for leaks.


16 posted on 09/11/2014 6:25:17 PM PDT by FlJoePa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: FlJoePa
PA's case for obstruction rested entirely on the "prisoner's dilemma."

The obstruction cases are based on the illogical conclusion that because we've discovered what Sandusky did in hindsight, there must have been a cover-up. That's the kind of "thinking" that all conspiracy theories require. Unfortunately for the Commonwealth, none of the people charged with a crime can turn on the others, because except for Sandusky's transgressions, there was no crime.

19 posted on 09/11/2014 6:32:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (His first name is 'Unarmed,' and his given middle name is 'Teenager.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson