With the exception of the Cochran race, which I think no ethical conservative can support, I would rather vote for a pro-life republican than an anti-life democrat.
Scott Brown, iirc, is pro-abortion, so he’s a new quandary that I’ve not looked into yet. If he does turn out to be pro-abortion, then I’ll not be supporting him either.
A politician who will kill babies is a politican who will fall for anything if the wind happens to be blowing in that direction. No regard for life means no regard for life.
I agree a pro-abort would be a tough call, but it’s a call you have to make if both candidates are pro-aborts. I’m vilified (by some FReepers) for saying this, but it’s not black and white.
There are different levels of pro-aborts. Perhaps the opponent supports government funded abortion on demand at any time for any reason. Most Democrats do. A Republican that is generally pro-abort but supports restrictions is better.
I’m talking about general elections of course. One can (and SHOULD!) try to defeat the pro-abort RINO in the primaries. Even if your stuck with the RINO, you might still have some sway over them. That’s better than what you’ll get from a Democrat (absolutely nothing).
Don’t forget. Senators are there for six very long years. Pick the course that best serves your cause or at least does the least amount of damage.