The warning for the other site could be legit for many reasons. I’ve had to fight with a webmaster before over this, she said the same thing, that google is blocking her blog for what she wrote about Obama, it was impossible for me to convince her with the mountain of evidence I provided that indeed malicious code was being served from her site, in this case it was an old vulnerable version of her blogging software that allowed the attacker to alter her pages. In most cases it is disreputable ad agencies that serve anything for a payment, things like Flash and Silverlight are laughably insecure, never host these if you can’t trust the author, the ad agencies don’t care, sometimes the webmasters don’t care because these agencies pay higher.
As for the warnings triggered on FR pages, it seems google has changed the algorithm a bit and now flag pages which link to infected sites. Our mod squad is incredibly attentive to these reports
Thanks John.
Should have replied “thanks John” not “Jim” lol...read it too fast I guess.