Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: txhurl

I found an article that summarized the book nicely, but there is a problem with the theory. At the time that the book came to print, the research on the mass graves from Black Death was sketchy at best.

Five years later a very serious project was set up to hunt for Plague in multiple different regions across the world. And they found it.

It is conclusive that Black Death was Plague.

HOWEVER, what I found interesting were the reasons that the authors thought it was Ebola (or something like that). The Black Death did not move like Plague. It didn’t have all of the same characteristics of the Plague that we know today.

And there’s a reason for that. There were three different strains of Plague that caused the epidemic. Slight genetic variations exist between those three strains and what we have now.

The bad part is that the Black Death did behave, in many ways, like Ebola as it moved through a population. (Rates of transmission, length of the infectious stage, some of the symptoms were similar to some hemorrhagic fevers, etc)

From what I’ve read, Ebola has a very good chance of following the patterns of the Black Death.


72 posted on 09/30/2014 10:38:41 PM PDT by Marie (When are they going to take back Obama's peace prize?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Marie

In a world with ebola spreading somehow cancer just doesn’t seem that scary anymore.

Cancer runs in my family and I’ve had quite a few scares. Ijust had oral surgery to remove suspect tissue from my tongue(benign yay!)

This ebola seems far scarier.

Maybe because cancer isn’t contageous


76 posted on 09/30/2014 11:06:51 PM PDT by Califreak (Hope and Che'nge is killing U.S.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson