[UCANSEE2]

The assumption that they are our ‘ancestors’ may be incorrect to begin with.

If there were world-wide floods that wiped out most life on Earth, then it isn’t likely that we are ancestors of the non-survivors.

[truth_seeker]

“If there were world-wide floods that wiped out most life on Earth, then it isn’t likely that we are ancestors of the non-survivors.”

Uh, no. Our ancestors were among the survivors.

[BroJoeK]

UCANSEE2: "The assumption that they are our ‘ancestors’ may be incorrect to begin with.
If there were world-wide floods that wiped out most life on Earth, then it isn’t likely that we are ancestors descendants of the non-survivors."

The term "ancestors" is used loosely, since physical evidence points toward modern-humans first rising in Africa, not of the Neanderthal line.
And, today no Africans have "Neanderthal DNA" in their genomes.
Non-Africans do have some Neanderthal DNA -- from 2% to 4% -- which is now supposed to have resulted from, ah, er, ahem... Neanderthals in hiding in modern-human wood-piles...