Basically, you're just playing word-definition games -- what is a "transference", what is a "major animal group"?
The fact of the matter is that no individual animal ever magically gave birth to offspring of another "major animal group" -- but that is what you suggest evolution requires.
It does no such thing.
What happens instead is that separated populations of one species evolve separately until they can no longer interbreed; then we call them two species, not one.
Extended over tens and hundreds of millions of years, different species evolve, step by step, to new genera, families, orders, class, etc.
But no individual ever "transfers" into anything different.
PapaNew: "...whatever paltry evidence is conjured up is vastly outweighed by the tonnage of evidence of Intelligent Design which Darwinists "hand-wave and deny" although "there's nothing fraudulent or fake about it.' "
Of course, I believe the entire Universe is intelligently designed to produce exactly what we see today, including us.
We are not an accident, or even a probability, but we're here by design and for a purpose.
Science tells us that part of the methodology God used to get us here is called "evolution".
I sure don't have a problem with that, and don't really see why others like yourself do.
Well, we’re not that far apart, but I am certainly not playing “word-definition games” and not all evolution is “Darwinism” (The Origin of the Species).
Major animal groups: amphibians, birds, fish, invertebrates, mammals, and reptiles
http://animals.about.com/od/animal-facts/tp/animal-groups.htm
Transference between major animal groups is just what it says - something like a fish or its ancestor becoming a horse or its ancestor.
Transference between animal groups is the kind of evolution required by Darwinism becasue it theorizes that all living things evolved from a single organism source. But there is no evidence of this kind of transference. That is why I say Darwinism is a fake and a fraud. It is not true science because the theory fails the rigorous test of the scientific method.
But evolution within a major animal group is another story, like the different breeds of particular types of mammals like wolves and dogs. There is plenty of evidence of evolution WITHIN a particular type of animal or group but that type of evolution, but of course, that is not the kind required by Darwinism.