Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: BenLurkin
Only if one of the statements made under oath is shown to be false.

Did you read the article?

Under oath, several "witnesses" admitted they didn't see what happened, and either concocted their testimony based on hearsay from other people, and even to fit the autopsy report.

Just one of them:

Another witness had told the FBI after the shooting that he saw Wilson shoot Brown in the back, and then stand over his prone body to finish him off. But in his grand jury testimony, this witness, acknowledged that he had not seen that part of the shooting, and that what he told the FBI was "based on me being where I'm from and that can be the only assumption that I have."

There are many other examples. This wasn't an error in recollection. It was an outright fabrication.

The police should be prosecuting everyone of these people for lying under oath and/or filing a false police report. It shouldn't be tolerated.

20 posted on 11/26/2014 5:05:35 PM PST by justlurking (tagline removed, as demanded by Admin Moderator)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: justlurking

“based on me being where I’m from and that can be the only assumption that I have.”

This guy must be a college professor! Or a “journalist” at CNN.


23 posted on 11/26/2014 5:35:40 PM PST by 21twelve (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2185147/posts 2013 is 1933 REBORN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: justlurking

Prosecuted for false statements to the FEbi is one thing but when it came time to be risk perjury “Under oath, several “witnesses” admitted”


24 posted on 11/26/2014 5:37:56 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson