To: Morgana
While I am strongly opposed to abortion, I think this woman misses the point of “in case of rape or incest”.
The whole point of that wording is to give the pregnant woman the choice of keeping the baby or killing it.
It’s as ugly as it sounds, but it is not my place to judge.
Ugh, I need a shower now.
3 posted on
12/03/2014 12:27:13 PM PST by
Don W
(When blacks riot, neighborhoods burn. When whites riot, nations and CONTINENTS burn))
To: Don W
The whole point of that wording is to give the pregnant woman the choice of keeping the baby or killing it.
It’s as ugly as it sounds, but it is not my place to judge.
If you consider yourself a Christian, IT IS your place to judge.
John 7:24
24 Judge not according to the appearance, but judge righteous judgment.
5 posted on
12/03/2014 12:30:52 PM PST by
SoConPubbie
(Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency)
To: Don W
It is everybody's place to judge, and to do so justly.
This woman was deprived of a choice (which was gravely wrong); her baby was killed, which would not have been right, even if she had chosen it.
10 posted on
12/03/2014 12:52:24 PM PST by
Mrs. Don-o
("Do not judge by appearances, but judge with right judgment. " John 7:24)
To: Don W
I think you missed the point. The point is, this woman did not have a choice. Many other pregnant rape victims have had similar experiences of coercion.
To: Don W
While I am strongly opposed to abortion, I think this woman misses the point of “in case of rape or incest”.
The whole point of that wording is to give the pregnant woman the choice of keeping the baby or killing it.
It’s as ugly as it sounds, but it is not my place to judge.
The dreaded rape exception: will you compromise?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson