If it matched Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s sentiments, opinions and advice on the issue, I’ve got no problem with “who” wrote it. You think Obama writes all his stuff? You think Boehner/McConnell/Reid/Pelosi?etc writes all their stuff?
I honestly could not care less unless they had to overcome Attorney General Scott Pruitt’s objections to the letter by paying him off. That would be a problem. But if Pruitt is in agreement? No problem.
Isn’t the proper plural of Attorney general “Attorneys General”?
These guys should have sent their emails through the IRS router.
The carbon impact of Keystone 1 has been tripled:
(1) Implied carbon content as it crosses the US border;
(2) Inherent carbon release for the volume in the pipeline;
(3) Actual carbon content release at the refinery.
This is the tri-fold accounting done by the EPA to attain the ^wildly excessive^ amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Attorneys General was the accepted plural until pretty recently, when the folks in charge of such things said “OK, I give up...call ‘em attorney generals if you must”.