[napscoordinator]

She should not have posted the pictures. The one posted here is tame. A child should not be standing on an animal.

[MarMema]

I agree. The one where the child is full out standing on the dog is just wrong.

[C. Edmund Wright]

I see your sense of humor by pass operation was a success.....the child is not actually “standing” on the animal in the first place. One foot is on the ground and his hands are supported by the counter. Second, neither the dog nor the child is unhappy about this.

[cuban leaf]

She should not have posted the pictures. The one posted here is tame. A child should not be standing on an animal.

---

She NEEDS to post the pictures. It shows a lack of fear of those who disagree with her. It’s living in their heads rent free.

There is absolutely nothing wrong with what is in the photos. It’s all a matter of opinion. Same with spanking your kids, though recording that would be odd.

[bert]

Says who? What do you actually know about it?

[Jack Hydrazine]

What if it was a 250 lb. English Mastiff? Would that be okay?

[Leaning Right]

A child should not be standing on an animal.

I gotta agree. This case really is no big deal, but Sarah often makes choices that have lots of downside and little upside.

And for those who believe that the child is merely petting the dog, maybe so. But I'm very pro-Sarah, and petting wasn't my initial reaction.

[trisham]

The one posted here is tame. A child should not be standing on an animal.

***********************

Agreed.

[Lazamataz]

Moreover, THE DOG IS BLACK, proving SARAH PALIN is a WAYSISS, and TRODS ON THE BLACK MAN TO KEEP HIM DOWN!

It's a DOG WHISTLE to BE WAYCISS to the BLACK COMMUNITY.

[Timber Rattler]

Whatever. You probably would have sneered at me too when I rode our big dog around like a horse when I was a little kid.

[Windflier]

She should not have posted the pictures.

Agree. It's a rare moment of poor judgment on Sarah's part.

[dalereed]

He’s not standing on the dog. I do that to our cat and he loves it!!