Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Resettozero

You have not established how the problem (that is, the child’s objective) the dilemma (the situation that occurred and its risks) or the obvious solution (how a responsible parent prevents a situation from reoccurring in the future) are “liberal”. However, you have used that moniker on several occasions now.

Please explain how any of the above are “liberal” and not “conservative”.

It seems your concern over discussing another person’s child stems from the child being a member of a family of the political class. Or are you on record on FR as being against discussing another individual’s child for any reason, regardless of family background or prestige?


479 posted on 01/02/2015 4:12:57 PM PST by Altariel ("Curse your sudden but inevitable betrayal!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 471 | View Replies ]


To: Altariel
Please explain how any of the above are “liberal” and not “conservative”.

Previously responded to YOUR hypothetical statement; it wasn't mine. If you don't like my response or refuse to see that I've even responded to a senseless trick in the manner and wording that I did...well, okay then.
483 posted on 01/02/2015 4:17:50 PM PST by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies ]

To: Altariel

The dopiness about this whole subject is that people consider how people treat the family pet as a lib vs. conservative issue. LOL

Well, it just isn’t.


488 posted on 01/02/2015 4:22:28 PM PST by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 479 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson