[MarMema]

In other pics the child is standing completely on the dog.

[defconw]

If the dog did not like the child standing on him. The child would be on the floor and the dog would be standing on the child.

[cuban leaf]

In other pics the child is standing completely on the dog.

---

I’ve seen them all. And they are all equally non-damning.

[arthurus]

I see those, too. The dog does not look perturbed. The child is not large. The dog is not small. Is it the dog’s dignity that is a cause of so much concern? I suspect it is all because “Sarah Palin.” Her choice of what to eat for breakfast is surely a cause of high indignation and worthy of editorials and a 20/20 segment.

[Elsiejay]

” In other pics the child is standing completely on the dog.”

And the meaning of this is what? That Sarah Palin is a dopey airhead that should be drummed out of polite society?

If the dog was experiencing any meaningful (to him/her) distress or annoyance, he or she would have made that known.

[ViLaLuz]

” In other pics the child is standing completely on the dog.”

Good way to get bit.

[D Rider]

If the dog was bothered by it, it would have yelped and moved or just bitten the kid or both. This is a typical liberal non issue issue.