Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Many Landlords Won't Take Section 8
WROC-TV ^ | December 8, 2014 | Rachel Barnhart

Posted on 01/10/2015 1:06:08 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last
To: BenLurkin


There are about 10,000 families who have been on the waiting list...
“Families”?

Doubt that.

More likely single women with clutches of bastard children. “

Comment of the day!!


21 posted on 01/10/2015 1:17:50 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

Section 8 does not give you the $10,000 or $20,000 to repair or remodel your property after the “tenants” totally trash it and move out. Nobody in their right mind takes Section 8.


22 posted on 01/10/2015 1:18:25 PM PST by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose o f a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If you own rental property in a jurisdiction that is considering this kind of law, I have some advice: SELL NOW!


23 posted on 01/10/2015 1:18:48 PM PST by Former Proud Canadian (Gold and Silver are Real Money, Accept No Substitutes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

“Fair” housing.
“Fair” wages.
“Fair” freedom.
“Fair” speech.

“Fair” being whatever the TV networks make the most profit on- isn’t democracy wonderful?


24 posted on 01/10/2015 1:20:03 PM PST by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gen.Blather

Require tenants to abide by the rules. If they don’t evict them.

It usually is seldom a matter of income as is it of character.

Not every poor person is a cheat or someone seeking to trash a place.

When in doubt, check references particularly with previous landlords from whom a prospective renter has rented before.


25 posted on 01/10/2015 1:21:09 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

If they require landlords to take Section 8, the number of rental properties would go down to 0.


26 posted on 01/10/2015 1:21:14 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
More likely single women with clutches of bastard children.

And all from different baby-daddies.

27 posted on 01/10/2015 1:21:20 PM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

The woman featured in the article says she’s a single mother with 2 boys. There’s no mention of the father(s). As far as I’m concerned, the father(s) should be paying for at least part of the rent, before the taxpayers should be asked to pay.
But then, that makes sense..


28 posted on 01/10/2015 1:21:54 PM PST by Radagast the Fool (At my signal, UNLEASH PALIN!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I detect Cloward-Piven in play here.

The Government would love to take over housing. So if they demand landlords accept Section 8, private citizens would no longer want to rent housing....So the only solution would be a Federal takeover of housing.


29 posted on 01/10/2015 1:22:58 PM PST by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I couldn’t even watch all that bleeding heart crap about “LaTanya” and her uncited “disability”.

She ain’t disabled enough to not afford a nice wig, or the furnishings in her home. She’s disabled with what? She was outside walking with the kids and wasn’t limping or anything? She could speak and certainly could put on her wig in the morning. Disability my ass. This woman is a professional slack, period. She ain’t hit a lick of work since the dude she hooked up with dumped her trifling ass.

These people DESTROY homes because they have nothing invested in them. They destroy and they move on to the next one, the next time.

LaTanya, if you wants some extra money, find that no good jackass you lay down with and get him on Maury and then serve him a child support order.


30 posted on 01/10/2015 1:23:22 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lurker

We had tremendous problems with the Section 8


Our city has the lowest crime rate, for any city of 50,000 - 60,000 residents in California. Unfortunately, one of the apartment complexes accepts Section 8. To their credit, the Sheriff’s Dept. maintains a nearly 24/7 presence, in the parking lot.


31 posted on 01/10/2015 1:23:44 PM PST by jttpwalsh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

The other thing is the detailed inspection the government does before you can take section 8 at least here. I would have no problem taking the money but I do not have any units which could pass the inspection. The other scary thing is the state and counties are passing laws which codify the requirements the inspectors are looking for into law so you are constantly in violation when you have tenants.


32 posted on 01/10/2015 1:24:06 PM PST by scottteng (Suntrust Bank is the worlds worst stay away!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Radagast the Fool

If she got child support and alimony, she wouldn’t even need to wait for Section 8.

The real question though, why isn’t she married? Marriage is the best anti-poverty program around.


33 posted on 01/10/2015 1:24:59 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

what is this woman’s “disability”?.....I’m sure it must be stress, or a bad knee or perhaps she’s got a personality disorder or maybe she’s just a lazy jerk?...


34 posted on 01/10/2015 1:25:20 PM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

now that libtards are redefining families, they’re “families”. air quotes needed.


35 posted on 01/10/2015 1:25:48 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

She couldn’t get the SNAP, the WICs the Section 8 if she was married. She’d only take the child support if she could hide it from the government. Otherwise, she’d have to work....that’s why.


36 posted on 01/10/2015 1:26:48 PM PST by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Gaffer

Happened to my Brother, he was sent overseas and had a Property Managment Co. take care of his house, they rented it to a Section 8 woman with 4 rugrats and a boyfriend and within 6 months the placed was trashed. Broken windows, doors, flooded bathroom floors, broken appliances etc. When we finally got them out of there [they know all the ins and outs of the system and it took about anther 6 months to boot them out] they stole all the rest of the working appliances. Unbelivable! The school administration was disappointed that they left because they were the only Black kids in the school, BOO-HOO. We lost our Diversity.


37 posted on 01/10/2015 1:27:04 PM PST by ABN 505 (-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

LaTanya Is on disability. Injured vet or workplace injury do you suppose?


38 posted on 01/10/2015 1:27:16 PM PST by MNDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet

I think they make a great point. If the banks can turn these people down for mortgages, why can’t the landlords turn down section 8 renters?

It’s clear they can through other means.


39 posted on 01/10/2015 1:27:39 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; Not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jttpwalsh

Enforce the rules on ALL tenants, regardless of income status.

If a landlord doesn’t, he loses any rights to claim damages for property degradation beyond normal wear and tear.

Don’t expect tenants to follow the rules if management isn’t serious about them.


40 posted on 01/10/2015 1:27:54 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-165 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson