Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2015's 'Leap Second' Could Scramble Computers
livescience.com ^ | | January 09, 2015 07:38am ET | Kelly Dickerson, Staff Writer

Posted on 01/12/2015 7:45:50 AM PST by BenLurkin

This will be the 26th leap second added to a calendar year since the practice began in 1972. In the past, the extra second has messed with computer systems. The last leap second was added in 2012, and it caused problems for big companies like Reddit, LinkedIn, Gizmodo and FourSquare.

The problem is that during the leap second, the computer clock shows 60 seconds instead of simply rolling over to the next minute, or shows the 59th second twice. The computer sees a leap second as time going backward, Matsakis said. The machine registers this as a system error, and the CPU can overload.

Google, to skirt the problem, will add a millisecond to its servers every once in a while throughout the year. This way, the slowed-down servers don't notice when an extra second is slipped in. Another good way to avoid any trouble is to simply shut down a computer system for an hour or two around the leap second, Matsakis said.

(Excerpt) Read more at livescience.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: 2015calendar; leapsecond; y2k
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: BenLurkin

I used to lift the heavy PA speakers onto the stands myself too.

I still do it for Church, but now i am a bass player and i have a REAL drummer! LOL!


21 posted on 01/12/2015 8:06:15 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Y2K was a real problem, but hyped up to the stratosphere.
A lot of people worked to make sure that nothing would happen and lo and behold, nothing did.
The Y2K work was not a failure, it was a success.
The failure was in the hype and the bogus letdown.

22 posted on 01/12/2015 8:14:36 AM PST by BitWielder1 (Corporate Profits are better than Government Waste)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

No.

Just....No


23 posted on 01/12/2015 8:15:50 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you are not part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

GPS and TAI time do not correct for leap seconds, so you have to factor in the accumulated number of leap seconds since their respective epochs, (35 seconds for TAI, 16 seconds for GPS) to derive UTC.

Not an issue for most computers to comprehend if the programmer had any brains.


24 posted on 01/12/2015 8:20:25 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

Image and video hosting by TinyPic

25 posted on 01/12/2015 8:21:22 AM PST by b4its2late (A Liberal is a person who will give away everything he doesn't own.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

At least we get a warning this time. The last time this was done in 2012, many people were caught offguard. It raised hell where I work as customer systems were going down left and right for a couple of days at the beginning of July.


26 posted on 01/12/2015 8:23:09 AM PST by Bloody Sam Roberts (Life and death are but temporary states. But Freedom endures forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
This is only a problem for hyper-accurate time keeping requirements for technologies such as GPS.

But GPS time doesn't adjust for leap seconds. There is a different line in the transmitted GPS time word that describes the accumulated leap seconds since GPS epoch in 1980.

27 posted on 01/12/2015 8:23:45 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
LinkedIn

I agree. All 257 of my LinkedIn spam emails were 26 seconds late today!

28 posted on 01/12/2015 8:24:11 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HereInTheHeartland
That is why I didn’t worry about it;

I didn't "worry" about it. I worked on it, starting in about 1997.

I had confidence that Americans were smart enough to fix it;

Thank you.

and we had a lot of time to prepare.

We did indeed. By the time the brainless idiots in Big Media found out about it, it was largely a solved problem.

29 posted on 01/12/2015 8:26:33 AM PST by NorthMountain (No longer TEA Party ... I'm the TAF Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo

The receivers on the ground wouldn’t necessarily account for that, would they?


30 posted on 01/12/2015 8:27:26 AM PST by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: rarestia
The receivers on the ground wouldn’t necessarily account for that, would they?

The receivers use GPS time at all times. Time displays that reference GPS time do have to take it into account.

Here's a web page that the major time types: http://leapsecond.com/java/gpsclock.htm

31 posted on 01/12/2015 8:33:27 AM PST by Yo-Yo (Is the /sarc tag really necessary?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: left that other site
...and it was all a hoax.

It wasn't a hoax. The IT industry spent several years fixing it.

People think it was a hox because we were actually successful.

32 posted on 01/12/2015 8:38:10 AM PST by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BitWielder1
Y2K was a real problem, but hyped up to the stratosphere. A lot of people worked to make sure that nothing would happen and lo and behold, nothing did. The Y2K work was not a failure, it was a success. The failure was in the hype and the bogus letdown.

That, and most companies finished months ahead of schedule with their preparations, and then figured out they could attach "Y2K" to just about any project and get management funding.

So many projects got done under the Y2K flag that the entire consulting industry had crashed by the end of Feb 2000 - most busineses either had no money left, had no projects pending, or both.
33 posted on 01/12/2015 9:26:29 AM PST by chrisser (Silly Wabbit. Trix are for kids. And Cheetos are for Rinos.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce

Please read #20.

I didn’t express myself correctly, and apologized.


34 posted on 01/12/2015 9:39:54 AM PST by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
That's


35 posted on 01/12/2015 9:55:37 AM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: grania
I remember doom. Didn't it happen at the beginning of the year 2000?

Oh I remember that very well...
I was walking along the beach around midnight, on the east coast of Costa Rica, Jaco Beach, and I did notice that there was a serious disturbance of the force, just about the time there was a serious deluge of rain.

It was awful!

36 posted on 01/12/2015 11:35:22 AM PST by publius911 (Formerly Publius6961)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Uh, no.

That’s not the way computers “tell time”. Computers count the number of seconds elapsed from some pre-defined “epoch” date, and then use software functions to represent that elapsed time as a a date, hours, minutes, and seconds using the defined locale (e.g., US Eastern vs. UTC). The computer’s internal “wall clock” is typically synchronized with a network time service which in turn is synchronized to an atomic clock.

A computer that is not patched to deal with the upcoming “leap second” will simply show time to be one second ahead of what the reference time actually is.


37 posted on 01/12/2015 11:40:14 AM PST by kevkrom (I'm not an unreasonable man... well, actually, I am. But hear me out anyway.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

A government task force with massive powers is the only thing that can save us.

Women and minorities hardest hit.

CTRL ALT DEL


38 posted on 01/12/2015 12:30:49 PM PST by Organic Panic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson