Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr. Lucky

“There appears to be no testable explanation as to how abiotic chemicals “evolved” into molecules, rather than the expression of a belief that such an event must have occurred”

An oldie but goodie ...

The classic experiments of Miller (1953) showed that impressive yields of certain amino acids can be obtained when a mixture of gases (hydrogen, methane, ammonia and water vapor) is exposed to an electrical discharge. This discovery represented a major breakthrough, since amino acids are the monomers that compose all proteins. The mixture was assumed to be a simulation of the original terrestrial atmosphere which, by analogy with the outer planets, would have contained hydrogen, methane, ammonia and water vapor. At sufficiently high energy fluxes, such reducing systems of gases generate hydrogen cyanide (HCN) and formaldehyde (HCHO), which in turn react to produce amino acids. Cyanide and formaldehyde are now considered to be key reactants in simulations of prebiotic chemical pathways (Ferris and Hagan, 1984).


178 posted on 01/23/2015 12:27:57 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGator
The problems with the Miller-Urey experiment are widely discussed in the literature. In order for their "experiment" to work, they had to produce an atmosphere to, among other things, contain no oxygen because an experimental atmosphere which resembled the atmosphere of early earth would have been caustic to the organic molecules they hoped to create. See, for instance Deamer, Microbiology & Molecular Biology Reviews, Vol. 61:239 (1997).
181 posted on 01/23/2015 5:38:40 PM PST by Mr. Lucky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson