Intelligent design is not creationism, nor is it a religious position. It is the application of
design theory to the natural and living world.
As for science or research - from the new intelligent design research lab, there was discussion of two technical articles published in the Journal of Molecular Biology by protein scientist Doug Axe (for abstracts, see here and here). As the New Scientist acknowledged, funding for the research underlying these peer-reviewed articles was provided by Discovery Institute's research fellowship program--thus disproving the twin canards that Discovery Institute does not support scientific research, and that pro-ID scientists do not publish peer-reviewed research.
For more ID papers see HERE or HERE
So by "Storm-sludge, the glassware-washer wonder-jocky's" logic the
International Journal of Evolutionary Biology is merely a "peer reviewed" journal of "apologetics" too, perhaps?
From their web site:
About this Journal International Journal of Evolutionary Biology is a peer-reviewed, open access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in all areas of evolutionary biology.
Evolution is their premise. No problem with that. They make their premise loud and clear in the title of their journal. Their articles are by their own claim, "peer reviewed."
Similarly, ID is the premise of BIO-Complexity. No problem with that either. The writer of the article likewise claims "peer review."
Evolution's apologists are intellectually dishonest to the core and hypocrites to a man.
And you saw just another glittering example of that right here again from one of the most glaringly intellectually dishonest leftovers from the Darwin Central coven ever to infect the threads of FR.
FReegards!
