Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Heartlander
While Jerry Coyne cannot or will not accept the immateriality of the intellect, will, and reality of free will, Karl Popper had no such problem.

Popper (1902-1994) was a British philosopher and a professor at the London School of Economics. Because he is regarded as one of the greatest philosophers of science of the 20th century, what he had to say about philosophical materialism and Darwinism is of utmost importance to the down and dirty war of attrition waged by methodological and ontological naturalists against creationists and intelligent design adherents.

Though Popper favored evolutionary theory and natural selection, he also forthrightly stated that Darwinism is not a testable scientific theory but rather a metaphysical research program. By this he means that not only is Darwinism metaphysical (immaterial/spiritual), but so are its' two most important foundations, classical empiricism and the observationalist philosophy of science that grew out of it.

Empiricism is a theory of knowledge that contradicts itself by asserting that human knowledge comes only or primarily via sensory experience rather than the mind while observationalism asserts that human knowledge and theories must be based on empirical observations....instead of the mind. For this reason, Popper argued strongly against empiricism and observationalism, saying that scientific theories and human knowledge generally, is conjectural or hypothetical and is generated by the immaterial creative imagination.

In other words, all three theories originated in the immaterial mind, a power of which is imagination. As spirit (intellect and will) is the citadel of the soul, then Darwinism, empiricism, and observationalism are spiritual.

The Founding generation knew that mind is a power of soul, and imagination the power by which mind conceives. In Noah Webster's American Dictionary of the English Language, 1828, soul and imagination are respectively defined as:

1. Soul: "The spiritual, rational and immortal substance in man, which distinguishes him from brutes; that part of man which enables him to think and reason."

2. Imagination: "...the power or faculty of the mind by which it conceives and forms ideas of things communicated to it by the senses....The business of conception (and the) power of modifying our conceptions, by combining the parts of different ones so as to form new wholes of our own creation...(imagination) selects the parts of different conceptions, or objects of memory, to form a whole more pleasing, more terrible, or more awful, than has ever been presented in the ordinary course of nature."

In short, Darwinism, classical empiricism and the observationalist philosophy of science claim to be what they are not in order to obtain an advantage over the Genesis account of creation and intelligent design by imposition of immoral means. We need to realize that the most zealous and outspoken defenders of this false science are arrogant sophists who hate truth and reality and mean to keep it out.

11 posted on 01/27/2015 9:53:36 AM PST by spirited irish
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: spirited irish
In other words, all three theories originated in the immaterial mind, a power of which is imagination. As spirit (intellect and will) is the citadel of the soul, then Darwinism, empiricism, and observationalism are spiritual.

This philosophical insight is actually reduced to an experimentally reproduceable phenomenon in cases where the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle applies.

13 posted on 01/27/2015 10:33:29 AM PST by Talisker (One who commands, must obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: spirited irish
Webster was a bit confused: all, that's ALL, living things have a soul of life. To what degree is taxonomically debated. watch a bird seek a branching of two limbs in a tree into which can place a nut it wishes to pick into and you know that at least that bird has the ability to think and reason, yet that bird is not a human. Humans are said to have yet another level of animation, a spirit, within their soul. Hence human reasoning is said to have parameters of good and evil, which the reasoning of the bird does not have.

Even Paul acknowledged that man has a spirit, a soul, and a body. The soul is not the spirit. The mind is an aspect of the soul and even a bird has a mind, but in humans the mind of the soul can be informed via spiritual level reasoning.

20 posted on 01/28/2015 3:41:45 PM PST by MHGinTN (Is it really all relative, Mister Einstein?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson