Being confronted with the truth, I'd imagine. So much easier to stay passive when you can pretend that what actually happens, doesn't.
Maybe it’s upsetting to him to have pictures of mutilated, dead bloody babies in front of his home.
This is a fairly serious crime or set of crimes, he should be facing something that should result in some moderately serious charges and punishment for terrorizing those people.
Something like 30 days in jail and a $5,000.00 fine, and damages.
I hope the first question is not rhetorical and someone has an answer. I do have some insight into Illinois.
I accept the man’s comment that he is neither pro-life nor pro-abortion. Large numbers of people and large numbers of voters at election time want to avoid controversy. They want to avoid taking sides on controversial issues.
They will vote against the candidate who makes them uncomfortable. It is not nice to make people uncomfortable. Exposing the true nature of abortion is one of the most obvious ways to make someone uncomfortable.
A few years ago there was a GOP primary; a pro-life candidate challenging the most liberal. pro-abortion, pro-corruption Republican in the IL legislature. The good-government activists (who were also pro-life) tried to convince the pro-life activists to get pragmatic and work for the pro-life candidate. But the pro-life activists stated that they didn’t get involved in politics.
Then the weekend before election day the pro-life activists blanketed the highways and intersections with extremely graphic pictures of aborted babies.
That lost the election for the pro-life candidate by jusgt a few votes. It was very predictable that the graphic pictures would create a backlash.
This is the real world. If we want to win, we have to act smart and pragmatic.
That fat SOB would be searching for a competent surgeon to put his face back together if he had tried to take those from me. He’s pretty brave picking on a young girl but I guarantee he’d have a whole new concern had I been there.
The man came across the road, and onto public property and caused a disturbance, and verbally threatened an individual. He, then, STOLE/ROBBED/CONFISCATED without legal authority, other people’s property. He acted to intimidate, and cease a gathering of individuals in a public place.
I’d sue his butt off, for damages, for his house, his car, and his job.
The nut case should be charged...
bump