The US Supreme Court is in the business of doing that ... BECAUSE ... of two reasons.
(1) There is a dispute between two parties, and one or both brings it to the Judicial Branch of government (one of the three branches of government) for a decision between the two parties. Now that shouldn’t be hard to comprehend, because it happens every day, with all sorts of disputes between parties.
(2) A decision is made in the dispute between the parties at odds with each other, and the losing side appeals to a “higher court”. Eventually, if one of the parties decides to keep appealing, it will end up being presented to the US Supreme Court to review, since they are at the “end of the line” and the highest court in the Judicial Branch of Government.
What I’ve described is a VERY NATURAL PROGRESSION in a court case where there is a dispute brought to the Judicial system by opposing parties.
NOW ... I would have thought you would have already known this, as to HOW THE US SUPREME COURT ends up being involved, but if you didn’t ... that’s how.
AND THEN ... as I said before ... if the people of the USA think that the decision made by the U.S. Supreme Court in adjudicating the matter between opposing parties is WRONG, the framers of the U.S. Constitution gave the “people” the ability to enact a Constitutional Amendment to override the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court (and overriding the court has been done before).
ALSO ... one other thing to keep in mind here, is that the U.S. Constitution provides that one CANNOT HAVE property, rights, freedoms and/or a whole host of other things (like money, too) TAKEN AWAY without DUE PROCESS. That “due process” is handled by the Judicial Branch of Government. AND AGAIN ... “HOW” the U.S. Supreme Court gets involved.
You are making a regulatory issue into a federal case.