To: RayChuang88
The only bad part of a re-engine is no more black smoke coming from those B-52s at takeoff. :0
9 posted on
02/19/2015 8:09:58 AM PST by
C19fan
To: C19fan
Looks like
some 2 minute film clip that effectively shows a LOT of the comments here ..
If you let it play through, the next one auto plays .. Minimum Interval Take Off (real footage)
29 posted on
02/19/2015 8:46:16 AM PST by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
To: C19fan
The reason for the re-engine proposal is not only eliminating the smoke contrails, but also more power at takeoff (220,000 lb. thrust from four F103's versus 144,000 lb. thrust from eight TF33's) and way lower fuel consumption. Just the more engine power makes it easier to carry the massive GBU-57 Massive Ordnance Penetrator bomb that weighs 30,000 lb., some 8,000 lb. more than the famous World War II Grand Slam bomb.
50 posted on
02/19/2015 9:43:54 AM PST by
RayChuang88
(FairTax: America's economic cure)
To: C19fan
The only bad part of a re-engine is no more black smoke coming from those B-52s at takeoff. :0
If I remember correctly, only the B-52 G and H had TF-33's. I think the B, C, D and F models had Pratt J-57's. D-M had a Buff Squadron in the early sixties. As kids, we loved watching them blow out bunches of black smoke as they took off.
65 posted on
02/19/2015 11:47:51 AM PST by
wjcsux
("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act." - George Orwell)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson