Posted on 02/26/2015 4:50:12 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network
Well for one thing Carly really nailed Hillary to the wall. She has a really good grasp of the conservative point of view. She is also very good at articulating it.
GOP voters have lttle influence on the eventual nominee.
The way the calendar is set up and the rules changes that have been implemented along with open primaries have given the RNC control.
Those open primaries are open because the RNC wants them that way.
They will get their amnesty candidate.
They got the author of McCain/Kennedy in 2008
They got the author of Romneycare in 2012
Are you suggesting that those 2 candidates were really the choice of GOP voters?
Jeb Bush will be nominated, it’s already been paid for.
If only Fiorina could have won an election somewhere, sometime.
Special Report has been doing background segments on possible GOP candidates. I really like what Fiorina has to say.
Nonsense. Palin stands a vastly better chance of winning than Fiorina. Fiorina shouldn’t even be in the conversation. She couldn’t even win the US Senate seat in her own state California. What makes you think she can win nationally? Palin not only won in Alaska, she won by beating the GOPe, AND was a very good effective governor with off the charts approval ratings. FioriWHO?
This woman is a disaster why they keep trying to prop her up every election cycle is beyond me
Now says "Where did I say that only a woman can win?" + "I didn't expect you to point out that one, given that I was agreeing with you about supporting Cruz." = "I deny saying that."
I've answered this twice now and even granted that you called my bluff, so I doubt you'll understand if I answer it again.
Maybe I'll just vote to keep my government benefits, like all of those other Hispanics of whom you said "Hispanics largely vote to keep their government benefits." in post 31.
And just how did that retarded Democratic campaign on the so-called “GOP war on women” work out in the November 2014 elections?
From what I've seen of him, I agree with you.
Fiorina. for all her possible positive attributes, remains almost unknown in her home state
and discriminatory employment practices
abound in SillyCon Valley (which is to say, she is vulnerable to various kinds of political attacks if she actually gets into a serious election campaign)
and of course she appears to be a female version of a country-club-corporate-republican... a serious liablity in that the R base won’t bother voting and the D’s will never vote for an R...resulting in a loser
again, everything in above is by appearances only, I’ve never had the priv of meeting her....but have to say she does not appear to be positioned as any kind of a viable candidate right now anyway
Some of the best leaders ever born were men. Your point being ?
Ted Cruz will CRUZ Hilary Clinton if he is nominated. And you can that to the bank. It won’t even be close.
CRUZ = CRUSH
Is her candidacy a joke? She lost by 10 points to Barbara Boxer when she ran for Senate in 2010.
I put her and Meg Whitman in the same loser category.
I thought that was a play on words, and I understood what you meant. If he gets the nod, I’ll work very hard to prove myself wrong and you right.
I do wish Jim would make a “LIKE” button
I don’t think I’ve seen such nonsensical babbling in a FR post before.
Go get some rest.
Well Barbara Boxer is not running for President that I know of.
No republican is going to do well in local CA political races. Jesus could probably not beat Babs in her dist.
How about from you own posts, which is where much of it came from?
Go get some rest.
I don't need any. I don't need to hold down a job, because I'm collecting all of my government benefits.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.