Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Cringing Negativism Network

I understand you’re for Palin. That isn’t pandering.

But you said you also think we’re going to need a female candidate.

That’s pandering.


37 posted on 02/26/2015 5:19:39 PM PST by CatherineofAragon ((Support Christian white males---the architects of the jewel known as Western Civilization.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]


To: CatherineofAragon

Well I believe the democrats will patronize women by running a female candidate next time, if the GOP doesn’t have someone like Palin ready.

That may be unfortunate, but our media is (very) involved in politics. As a player, not as a media.

The GOP needs to be aware of that, and play that.

I am not saying we must run a woman, but it is very important for Americans to recognize the left’s clout, and oppose that effectively.

Otherwise we will get four, or eight more years of Obama 2, to further damage America.

I believe women voters can be won over, and will vote in large part of the best candidate, but they will also run in a herd in part.

All I am saying is don’t hand democrats the opportunity to “herd” women into voting democrat.

Because they will, if we don’t fight that.


44 posted on 02/26/2015 5:27:55 PM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c5700.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: CatherineofAragon; Cringing Negativism Network

I agree with CatherineofAragon, though your sentiment is common enough, it is pandering.


95 posted on 02/27/2015 2:33:15 AM PST by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson