To: oh8eleven
He was taking newer drugs, and cheating in more innovative ways. This is all known, public information. He was the best, most aggressive cheater in the game in the years he was winning. I did not say he was the first or the only cheater, only that the statement “they were all cheating therefore the sport was actually fair” is ludicrous.
To: babble-on
I did not say he was the first or the only cheater
You called him a pacesetter - WTH is that?
He was the best, most aggressive cheater in the game in the years he was winning.
Nonsense. He won because he was a better cyclist than all the other dopers, not because he was a better doper. And it was only unfair to those who didn't dope.
22 posted on
03/09/2015 12:18:55 PM PDT by
oh8eleven
(RVN '67-'68)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson