The correct answer is:
The use of the term “baby” blanket is both gender-hostile, sexist, and potentially offensive to a: infertile couples, and b: same-sex partners in states run by Republican bastards who do not believe in bestowing rights clearly granted in the Constitution to couples whose sexual and thus reproductive proclivities may extend beyond normal womb-based gestation derived from obsolete concepts left over from phallo-dominated eras of societal norms. The question, therefore, imposes a paternalistic and no doubt white-dominated orthodoxy that has an overwhelming tendency to impose mores and symbology upon those who have a proven disadvantage servicing heating bills generated by greedy and polluting utility conglomerates whose concerns are their profit levels, both their own, and their shareholders who collectively could not care less about the relative temperatures nor circulatory congruences of their customers who generally have difficulties maintaining age-appropriate body temperatures since they have been underserved and underpaid in their slave-labor jobs which invariably do not pay enough to allow them to keep up with their utility bills. The superior approach, therefore, is to allow the various stakeholders; utility company; child unit (our preferred term), parent A and parent B, garment and textile engineering contractor, to freely express their disparate motivations within the context of a regulated and orderly construct developed by enlightened, yet supportive intellects fully comprehending the full panoply of vicissitudes comprising all elements surrounding this situation both in abstract, and in concrete. Then and only then will our work be done.