Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

‘Blurred Lines’ Infringed on Marvin Gaye Copyright, Jury Rules
NY Times ^ | 03.10.2015

Posted on 03/10/2015 7:24:46 PM PDT by Perdogg

For the last year and a half, the music industry has been gripped by a lawsuit over whether Robin Thicke’s 2013 hit “Blurred Lines” was merely reminiscent of a song by Marvin Gaye, or had crossed the line into plagiarism.

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Chit/Chat; Music/Entertainment
KEYWORDS: blurredlines; copyright; gaye; infringement; marvingaye; robinthicke; thicke
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: SomeCallMeTim

I like Marvin too, and i agree that the Soul Train clip showed a song that was WAY beneath his talents as a songwriter, but the new song sounded so much like it (to me, anyway) that I can understand the Judge’s ruling. I didn’t know either song until I played the clips, so i had no previous opinion about either of them.

“My Sweet Lord” was a better sounding song than “He’s So Fine”, and i doubt if George had ever heard the other song, but the ruling in that case was based upon the “6-note rule” which was in effect many years ago.

There is actually a legal precedent for this. If more than six notes match in rhythm and interval, it’s considered a copy. Just six notes is all it takes.

So...somewhere, those six notes matched up. I know. it doesn’t seem fair at all...especially with the size of the award.


21 posted on 03/10/2015 8:24:06 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

When music is composed THAT way, this type of copying hardly ever happens.

But, when it starts with a Rhythm and a Chord Progression, it is very easy to get caught in the 6-note trap.

And with the advent of beat-=boxes and drum machines, it will happen again and again.

Big money for lawyers.


22 posted on 03/10/2015 8:27:04 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Just like the recent ruling on Sam Smith’s Stay With Me, which copied a melody from Tom Petty’s “I Won’t Back Down.”


23 posted on 03/10/2015 8:27:17 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Blurred Lines is a 100X better song... This is a travesty.

I’m no lawyer. I don’t claim to know all the legal issues. But, I know music. If THIS is an infringement? Get ready for a WHOLE BUNCH MORE lawsuits..

I simply cannot believe this..


24 posted on 03/10/2015 8:28:14 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

Oh yes...I heard that song and immediately thought of the tom petty Song.


25 posted on 03/10/2015 8:28:42 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

I caught myself singing along with STay with me, using the Tom Petty lyrics...


26 posted on 03/10/2015 8:33:05 PM PDT by chae (The Lannisters send their regards--Game of Thrones)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

You know, I’ve read a few other posts about this issue.. and, people delve into the legalities.. and, “if you don’t know the law, you can’t comment”...

Well, I call “bullshit” on that. This is more like the SCOTUS definition of ‘obscenity’... I know it, when I see it.. or, rather, hear it.

IF the law says THIS is plagiarism? Then, the law is effed up. It’s not. It’s not even close. Any musician with an ear for music and the ability to count time can tell it’s not the same.


27 posted on 03/10/2015 8:33:11 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: chae

so have I... THAT, is a copy.


28 posted on 03/10/2015 8:33:38 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

That was settled out of court though, and Tom Petty got a writing credit on the song.


29 posted on 03/10/2015 8:33:59 PM PDT by Vince Ferrer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

It may indeed be 100X better. But if it fits the legal definition, than the ruling will stand.
It’s not a value judgement...it’s the stupid 6-note rule, which I find very hard to work around in my own composing. After all, there are only 12 notes in the Western Scale!

There may not have been any INTENTIONAL plagiarism at all, but the proliferation of loops, samples, beat-boxes, and canned sequences are going to make this happen more and more.

The Law is based on 20th century technology. We are now in the 21st. Maybe this “travesty”, as you call it, will stimulate change.


30 posted on 03/10/2015 8:36:44 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Bottom Line: This is MESSED UP.

It is NOT the same song. No one, ever would convince me that it is. Law be damned.


31 posted on 03/10/2015 8:40:17 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

In the article, it said they were comparing FOUR note sequences... WTF?


32 posted on 03/10/2015 8:41:12 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Boy, I cannot follow that, I get the general idea but it is general.

Fave song by Rogers?

Blossom Dearie does a good Manhattan.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MVlj0hHxmkE


33 posted on 03/10/2015 8:41:20 PM PDT by Beowulf9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim
if you don’t know the law, you can’t comment

I never said that to you...someone else may have, and it was ignorant of them.

So please, FRiend, direct your anger at the one who said this to you, and not to me. Thank you. Good night.
34 posted on 03/10/2015 8:41:25 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: SomeCallMeTim

Wow...4 notes now? Sheesh!


35 posted on 03/10/2015 8:42:35 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Beowulf9

Nice! :-)


36 posted on 03/10/2015 8:45:54 PM PDT by left that other site (You shall know the Truth, and The Truth Shall Set You Free.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg; Jack Hydrazine; Norm Lenhart; Salamander; TheOldLady; spyone; To Hell With Poverty; ...

This is the Modern Music Ping List. Our topic is music from the 20th and 21st century, from Ravel and Shostakovich through to the Synth Pioneers and beyond.

Topic suggestions are always welcome, and pings to music-related threads are appreciated.

FReepmail or reply to this post to be added to or removed from this list.

37 posted on 03/10/2015 8:46:47 PM PDT by Squawk 8888 (Will steal your comments & post them on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Vince Ferrer
That was settled out of court though, and Tom Petty got a writing credit on the song.

Jeff Lynne also co-wrote it.

38 posted on 03/10/2015 8:48:49 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: left that other site

Sorry FRriend. I didn’t mean that towards you. I was talking about some of the comments on a thread about this case a couple of days ago.. that’s when I went and listened to the songs..

I assumed, then.. that this case had NO merit. Now, I’m just shocked.

I’m sure that you, being a song writer, have a better appreciation for the legalities. I’m a fan, and an amateur musician. I just don’t see it.

As I said: If this decision is RIGHT, by the law... then, the LAW is wrong. Nothing against you.


39 posted on 03/10/2015 8:48:52 PM PDT by SomeCallMeTim ( The best minds are not in government. If any were, business would hire them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Is it similar? Sure. But I don’t buy the plagiarism ruling. Might as well say anything with a beat and falsetto singing like Prince’s “Kiss” or “Emotional Rescue” by The Rolling Stones are, too.


40 posted on 03/10/2015 8:51:26 PM PDT by edpc (Wilby 2016)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson