Druggies, homos, whatever.
Point is - they all present a health risk due to their dangerous and deviant lifestyles and they should be put away for the common good.
Meth was big in area until they came down heavy on the labs.
Austin , a small town, once house a very large canning factory that hired many many people from south of the border (often seasonal). Many stayed Rough area that has spilled into larger communities.
They recently moved the state police post out of Seymour (a larger town just north on interstate.) They used to be multiple St Police cars in and out. We don’t see many now
So It’s now blossomed without their constant presence in the area!
So much for cutting the budget
Wow! Here (FR) I thought the Constitution was the Law of the land. We (and I mean GOVT) have removed RESPONSIBILITY from (most) actions. There are no longer CONSEQUENCES to bad/harmful lifestyles/etc.
Brand them as the Typhoid Mary they are (listed online/in the papers/what-where ever), remove the taxpayer subsidies (aka Medicaid, etc.) and let the chips fall where they may. If they actively attempt to harm OTHERS, then yes, lock ‘em up. But, hey, if they can afford their new affliction, they are more than welcome to spend every penny they have on their habits and/or trying to stay alive because of them.
Others want to donate THEIR time/$$, again, I have NO complaints.
If ‘health risk’ were the bar for jail, you may as well just round up: the fatties, the extreme sporties, the drinkers, etc.