To: Perdogg
Do you mean Jack Reacher with the vertically challenged Tom Cruise playing the 6’ 3” Reacher? It was a no-go for me from the start.
48 posted on
03/28/2015 8:45:08 AM PDT by
bjc
(Show me the data!)
To: bjc
No Jack Ryan with Chris Pine.
53 posted on
03/28/2015 8:49:11 AM PDT by
Perdogg
(I'm on a no Carb diet- NO Christie Ayotte Romney or Bush - stay outta da Bushesh)
To: bjc
Something about Tom Cruise repels me anyway. I don’t know why, but Johnny Depp repels me even more.
95 posted on
03/28/2015 10:00:47 AM PDT by
Shimmer1
(Conservative. Because we can't all be on welfare.)
To: bjc
I knew I couldn’t see Reacher (although I love every book) because in my mind I’d see Cruise squeaking out “ Bend down here so I can twist your head off”.
125 posted on
03/28/2015 11:07:15 AM PDT by
Safetgiver
( Islam makes barbarism look genteel.)
To: bjc
the 6 3 Reacher
I'm not a Tom Cruise fan, but I thought it was laughably cliché in the book(s) to have the hero be yet another big ol' "He-Man: Masters of the Universe" type. Having a smaller man play Reacher showed a lot more toughness ("It's not the size of the dog in the fight, it's the size of the fight in the dog.") which made the character both more real and more impressive.
(Spoiler alert)
Of course, the whole, 'throw the rifle away and fight the bad guy with your bare hands' scene at the end was even more laughable. They take the time to show a guy who is ruthless enough to take out 5 guys through pure do-whatever-it-takes attack (a kick to the crotch, etc.) and then he wants to fight a noble-knights battle while the girl is still helpless in the hands of people who have demonstrated they are willing to kill half a dozen people to hide one targeted murder? Stupid.
128 posted on
03/28/2015 11:13:23 AM PDT by
Phlyer
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson