To: Citizen Zed
A preemptive nuclear strike on Tehran probably wouldn’t be a bad idea. The Israelis needs to slap Iran before Iran has a chance to slap them.
2 posted on
03/30/2015 11:03:43 PM PDT by
FlingWingFlyer
("I want to be America's first, historical, male first lady." - Slick Willie)
To: FlingWingFlyer
"If a man doesn't strike first, he will be struck first" Athengoras of Syracuse
4 posted on
03/30/2015 11:18:53 PM PDT by
Diogenesis
("When a crime is unpunished, the world is unbalanced.")
To: FlingWingFlyer
A preemptive nuclear strike? Easy to suggest that but I don't think so. Bibi and Moshe Ya'alon aren't that stupid to even think so. Iranian infrastructures are deep scattered underground. If Iran would try, Israelis got the finger of G-d in their side all the time.
6 posted on
03/30/2015 11:24:50 PM PDT by
hamboy
To: FlingWingFlyer
I'm not sure if it would have to be a nuclear strike by the israelis, would it? Why not just destroy the Mullah government in Tehran -- couldn't the Iranian people do the rest once they were gone? The people tried to revolt against them already, but thanks to Obama, they weren't able to go very far.
To: FlingWingFlyer
A preemptive nuclear strike on Tehran probably wouldn’t be a bad idea. The Israelis needs to slap Iran before Iran has a chance to slap them.Hear hear.
12 posted on
03/31/2015 1:50:30 AM PDT by
Captainpaintball
(Immigration without assimilation is the death of a nation -- FUJB!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson