[A_perfect_lady]

And that's the consensus of the scientific community, according to the "real" scientists.

Actually, I'm reading this author's (Fitzgerald's) pdf Ten Myths About Jesus right now, and there's nothing like that. He's saying there are only 2 references to Jesus, and that one is largely regarded as a 4th century forgery, while the other is authentic, but is about a different Jesus (a high priest who was given a political post as compensation when his brother was murdered by the post's previous holder.)

[rusty schucklefurd]

An excellent refutation of Fitzgerald’s work is given by an atheist, named Tim O’Neil. Here is a link to his critique:

http://armariummagnus.blogspot.com/2013/12/the-jesus-myth-theory-reponse-to-david.html