“4) There must be a scientifically valid and repeatable scientific experimental model that ties in man’s activities with the increased temperature.” (and ACCURATELY predicts present and future increases)
That’s the big one.
There must be a scientifically valid and repeatable scientific experimental model that ties in man’s activities with the increased temperature.” (and ACCURATELY predicts present and future increases)
Yes, I think the author of the piece has the mistaken notion that the burden of proof is on hypothesis skeptics; it is not. It is the duty of the investigator to prove his or her assertion experimentally. Scientists and modelers are not given a presumption of fact for their contentions, in fact, it is quite the opposite.