Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: P-Marlowe
They are thinking that they are not liable since they didn't operate the track.

I think if the company (Disney) took someone's money in exchange for a service, and something bad happened during this service, they won't be able to wiggle out all that easily. The company would have to demonstrate that they performed all the reasonable and expected steps to ensure safety of their customers. It would be trivial for the opponent to show that giving random people control over powerful cars with unique control characteristics simply cannot end well. It does not matter who operated the track, as long as Disney knew about it and allowed its operation.

11 posted on 04/12/2015 10:44:17 PM PDT by Greysard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Greysard

Even if Disney had liability, they would have an indemnity clause that would require the vendor to indemnify Disney for any and all liability resultant from the vendor’s operation.

So they sue Disney and Disney just tells the vendor to pay their attorney fees and any award.


12 posted on 04/12/2015 10:49:41 PM PDT by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson