Because I live in the world of evidence.?
Don’t we all. I doubt you have any, ANY hard evidence by which to be thumping you “self assuming authoritative” chest.
How do you know the cop did not know the perp was in control of the taser?
Which points to the FACT your opinion is no more valid than anyone’s opinion.
But one thing is evidence, the perp gave a false ID, ran, fought the cop, the cop and perp had some tangle in the taser wires, all of which gets to the laws of engagement that requires the cop to stop the perp by any means at his disposal at that point. Had he not stopped the perp and the perp then hurt or killed someone else, you and all the others would be screaming “the damn cop just let him get away”.
“Don’t we all. I doubt you have any, ANY hard evidence by which to be thumping you “self assuming authoritative”
Well, there is the video. Of Slager shooting at Scott 8 times as Scott ran away. And then moving evidence at a crime scene. So, yeah, there’s evidence.
” laws of engagement that requires the cop to stop the perp by any means at his disposal at that point”
No such “laws of engagement” exist.
all of which gets to the laws of engagement that requires the cop to stop the perp by any means at his disposal at that point.
***************************
Firstly there are no “laws of engagement” , rules YES , secondly the man did not engage the cop , the cop engaged him , the man simply bested the cop when he caught up with him , he did not harm the cop , and then he continued to run ,,, YOU SAY HE DESERVED DEATH FOR THAT? You’re just a punk bootlicker... we live in a surveillance police state , there is no way this should have ended in a mans death when he could have been picked up later that evening or the next day at his job...
The cop knew he murdered that man ,, he planted evidence next to the body to support YOUR POSITION that it was a good shoot... Well , if it was a good shoot why the need to plant evidence.
Please cite the South Carolina Statute number of such law.