Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Regulator

I think they would be better off if the dropped the landing a pencil idea and go with the tried and true glide landing. Then they could concentrate on cutting turn around time and costs.

After all, for earth landing and launch, turnaround time and cost is their primary problem.


22 posted on 04/18/2015 3:59:59 PM PDT by cripplecreek ("For by wise guidance you can wage your war")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: cripplecreek
Mmmm...like this? Dream Chaser

or this?

Energia Uragan

Fly back stages have been proposed, built and flown; it's still an overall trade that's hard to justify. Believe me, it's been done ad nauseum.

Stratolaunch is building a TSTO with flyable first stage (um, "airplanes"), and that seems to be the real way to go until somebody does a decent SSTO like Linear Airspike or the Skylon. Which may or may not work...but it seems like the ultimate best way to go with current engines.

Falcon 9 recoverable will eventually work, and for better or worse that's the path they took. Will it really be commercially viable? Bit more complicated...

35 posted on 04/18/2015 4:23:44 PM PDT by Regulator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson