"Proof" of what, exactly? Make yourself clear, please. My post, by the way, was not in response to the article (which I didn't read in any case because "rumors of tunnels being built to take over Texas" means it's probably an article worth ignoring), but my post WAS ONLY in response to circlecity's comment:
While the conspiracy theorists are working overtime, that doesn’t change the fact this Jade Helm 15 exercise is worthy of suspicion.
So ... what was I trying to "prove" using this article as "a base"? Any explanation you present will be silly because YOU MADE A WHOLE BUNCH OF WRONG, STUPID ASSUMPTIONS in your defensiveness, and wrote gobblydigook instead of sense.
I stand by my observation made over the years that your capacity for poor understanding and/or careless miscommunication is impossible to overestimate.
Perhaps. Perhaps I assumed you were intelligent enough to know the basics of what was being discussed. Perhaps I even assumed you had read the article.
which I didn't read in any case
lolol. Finny - you are a fool. But you do crack me up.