I just did.
You think that continuing to argue this point serves as cover your error on the content of the Ordinances?
Not much of a man if you can’t admit your error...and bullying a useless point does not change the facts.
In what post did I make this error?
Not much of a man if you can’t admit your error...and bullying a useless point does not change the facts.
So you're never going to explain why ordinances of secession issued by the conventions are valid expressions but declarations of causes issued by those same conventions are not, are you? Who's the coward?
In what post did I mistake the ordinances and the declarations?