Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: FreeAtlanta

I do believe the Stryker had to be up armored to stand any chance against RPGs and IEDs. The original armor was only good against heavy machine gun rounds. If you see pictures of Stryker’s in Iraq they have a metal cage around them to detonate RPG rounds before they hit the vehicle itself. The up armoring and now adding more firepower shows the deficiency of the original idea of the vehicle as maximizing strategic mobility and making up for the lack of armor/firepower with computer power.


5 posted on 06/12/2015 10:01:46 AM PDT by C19fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: C19fan

Between every conflict mobility and fire power become more important than armor. Armor returns when the bullets start to fly.


7 posted on 06/12/2015 10:30:24 AM PDT by DariusBane (Liberty and Risk. Flip sides of the same coin. So how much risk will YOU accept? Vive Deo et Vives)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson