This is your question?
I asked you to clarify, what do you consider "proper control in this specific case"?
Is your answer not to put a burglary suspect in the hospital?
Or do you have more guidelines?
“Is your answer not to put a burglary suspect in the hospital?”
Is there something wrong with that answer? That is the whole point. The handler did not have control of the dog. Why was that? was there something wrong with the dog or it’s training? Was there something wrong with the handler or his training?
These are things that you fail to mention as even possibilities - and you gloss over the fact that a kid criminal had to be admitted to the hospital for two or three days. Something went wrong, and you claim it’s everything but where the evidence points.