Anti Conservative Brad Dayspring Haunts Scott Walker Amid White House Bid

http://www.breitbart.com ^ | 7/14/2015 | Matthew Boyle

[conservativejoy]

Walker better be boning up on some BS to try to answer for some of this in the debates.

[PLOM...NOT!]

He does seem to post hit piece after hit piece on Walker. He’s someone to keep an eye on...

[MNlurker]

He already dealt with it when the same statistics you’re spewing were used in debates by Tom Barrett and Mary Burke and the electorate believed Scott Walker.

I think One Wisconsin Now should have some new “stats” for you to rattle off again in the near future.

[conservativejoy]

You seem to like One Wisconsin Now. I don’t refer to them anywhere, but you are preoccupied with them for some reason.

If Walker has no reason to worry, I think you can stop rushing to defend him like a mother hen. He must be a lot weaker than he wants folks to believe, at least you indicate he is by your constant defensiveness.

[MNlurker]

He’s a troll.

I’ll quit feeding it.

[conservativejoy]

If an article comes out not flattering to Walker it is labeled a “Hit” piece. With every other candidate it is called “vetting”.

I have even had Walker supporters make the claim that the attempt to repeal Wisconsin’s Open Records laws which was attached to the budget deal, was just made up liberal talking points. I posted an article on it from Fox News. I haven’t seen a move like that since Slick Willie pulled the same stunt in Arkansas before his Presidential run.

I am an unapologetic Cruz supporter who also supports Trump on illegal immigration.

Not everyone is sold on Walker. By no means am I alone.= in that.

[LS]

I think Walker has done a superb job as governor. I think Perry has done a pretty darn good job as governor. I think Kasich has been slightly positive as governor.

That doesn't mean I see any of them as visionary national leaders. I might see Walker that way, but he has to convince me. The slightest association with someone like Brad Dayspring gives me pause.

For example, I keep waiting for Walker to make the big jump to explaining how he beat unions in WI (he did) and how he'll de-fang big labor nationally (he hasn't). Or how he would get rid of Obamacare. (It's easy: just repeal it.)

[LS]

Ok, I can do that too. But he has a lot of convincing at a different level, namely that he has the bombast and vision (it takes both) to be a national leader. As I said above, he has whipped the unions in WI (terrific). Now, tell me why you'll spread this practice nationally and how your NLRB will stop coming down on the side of Big Labor. See what I'm saying? He has yet to explain how his state level successes really go beyond Wisconsin. Merely "good government' isn't enough because I---being suspicious of most Republicans---take that to mean "We'll do what Democrats do, but better." I need to see he has a national visionary leadership quality.

Haven't seen that yet.

[conservativejoy]

Thank you for your post. I, too, am waiting to hear a positive agenda from the candidates. The two so far that have impressed me with their ideas are Cruz and Trump.

I think we will have a clearer picture after the debates. Hopefully the field will begin to clear then of those who have no real reason to be in the race.

All in all, this has been the most interesting race in my memory.

[1010RD]

All or nothing! All or nothing! Oh, wait a minute. What do you mean Hillary! is my President?

[EternalVigilance]

If there were ever two things that must be all or nothing, it is the right to live and equal protection.