Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
People have a right to leave.

Sure they can leave. There's the border right over there. -->

But they can't take the territory of the sovereign people of the United States without their consent.

It's that whole "consent of the governed" thing, you know. Right there in the Declaration as well.

20 posted on 07/22/2015 8:38:27 AM PDT by EternalVigilance (Liberty cannot survive without morality.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: EternalVigilance
But they can't take the territory of the sovereign people of the United States without their consent.

No more than they can take the territory of the Sovereign of the British Union without his consent. Oh, wait...

It's that whole "consent of the governed" thing, you know. Right there in the Declaration as well.

The consent of people who do not live there is irrelevant. It is none of outsider's business what other people do with their own land.

34 posted on 07/22/2015 8:59:27 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance

“But they can’t take the territory of the sovereign people of the United States without their consent.”

There was no “sovereign people of the United States” at that time. There were a number of sovereign states, that had formed a political union. In each state that seceded, the people of the state gave their consent, either through popular vote, or through their elected representatives.

This notion of a “sovereign people of the United States” is a result of the fallout from that war. Before that, everyone properly understood that, if the individual states were not themselves sovereign, then they never would have had any power to form the “United States” in the first place.


57 posted on 07/22/2015 9:22:06 AM PDT by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: EternalVigilance
Sure they can leave. There's the border right over there. --> But they can't take the territory of the sovereign people of the United States without their consent.

Firstly, it is the central foundational premise of socialism/communism is that private ownership of property is not a natural right but rather one virtualized within the framework of community law. In expressing that exact sentiment, you've just unintentionally revealed your true ideological self.

Secondly, there was not a single political entity called "the sovereign people of the United States" prior to the rump passage of the Fourteenth Amendment. Sovereignty had previously been vested the in peoples of the several States. I'll help you out a little: The Fourteenth Amendment was recorded AFTER the war.

It's that whole "consent of the governed" thing, you know. Right there in the Declaration as well.

Ah, the Declaration of Independence, my most favorite act of secession (that you secretly hate).

942 posted on 08/04/2015 8:19:45 PM PDT by Brass Lamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson